Re: [Cz-L] Apropos religious marriage

Strictly technically speaking they were not married .
  As a result , their offsprings were automatically bastards
   and had to bear their mother's name.
    To many the religious registration was more important than the
     state registrar.
      But this was 1860 and people just came out of the Middle Ages.
    Hardy
----- Original Message -----
From: "Miriam Taylor" <mirtaylo_at_indiana.edu>
To: "Peter R. Elbau" <peter_at_elbau.info>; "Czernowitz-L_at_cornell.edu"
<czernowitz-l_at_cornell.edu>
Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2010 7:01 AM
Subject: Re: [Cz-L] Apropos religious marriage

I could not resist playing with the statistics provided by Peter.
Consider the implication:

Assume that the average lifespan in 1851was 55 years for all groups and that
all ages were equally represented in the population. Also assume that the
number of females and the number males was equal and that on the average
people married at the age of 20.
Then a group of 110 people would have included exactly one man and one woman
aged 20 who would have married in that year.

According to these assumptions there should have been 402 marriages among
the Roman and Greek Catholics. But there were 460 marriages. This could be
explained by widows and widowers marrying a second time.

Among Greek Orthodox there should have been 2861 marriages in 1851.
Actually there were 2537 marriages. We are led to assume that they either
married considerably later than at age 20, had a longer lifespan or that
many of them became monks and nuns.

Among the Protestants there should have been 66 marriages, but there were
only 63. Well, some people might have chosen not to get married.

Among Jews there should have been 133 marriages, but officially there were
8 (eight). Even though some couples might have decided to live "na viru"
(like in nature), it is hard to believe that 125 of 133 did so. Not in 1851!
They simply did not bother to register their rabbinical marriages officially
and their children were given their mothers' maiden names.
>From my father's school certificates I found that for many years he was
named Resch or Reisch, then at some point his name became Reifer.

Mimi

-snip-
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This moderated discussion group is for information exchange on the subject of
 Czernowitz and Sadagora Jewish History and Genealogy. The opinions expressed
 in these posts are the opinions of the original poster only and not necessarily
 the opinions of the List Owner, the Webmaster or any other members
 or entities connected with this mailing list. The Czernowitz-L list has
 an associated web site at http://czernowitz.ehpes.com that includes a
 searchable archive of all messages posted to this list. Please post in "Plain
 Text" if possible (help available at:
<http://www.jewishgen.org/InfoFiles/PlainText.html>).

To remove your address from this e-list follow the directions at
http://www.cit.cornell.edu/computer/elist/lyris/leave.html

To receive assistance for this e-list send an e-mail message to:
owner-Czernowitz-L_at_list.cornell.edu
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on 2010-07-25 06:45:17